Discovery
Can AI crawlers and answer engines access the pages that explain your business?
See whether ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and other AI experiences can discover, interpret, trust, cite, and potentially recommend your business.
AI systems can find the brand. Critical trust and entity signals are fragmented.
Priority finding
Product claims lack independently verifiable evidence and consistent entity connections.
Illustrative output. Scores are evidence-based estimates, not AI platform ranking data.
AI systems do more than index pages. They connect entities, reconcile claims, weigh sources, and assemble answers. If your evidence is scattered or ambiguous, your brand can be overlooked, misrepresented, or excluded.
Traditional analytics cannot show you this gap. QueryTrends makes the evidence visible.
We examine the public signals AI systems may use to understand who you are, what you know, and whether your content is worth referencing.
Can AI crawlers and answer engines access the pages that explain your business?
Do your site, profiles, and structured data describe the same company, products, and expertise?
Are important claims supported by credible sources, authorship, documentation, and original evidence?
Does your content make useful answers and supporting facts easy to extract and attribute?
Are schema, metadata, internal links, sitemaps, and canonical signals coherent?
Where does one selected competitor provide clearer or stronger evidence than your brand?
Not a pile of generic recommendations. Every finding connects observable evidence to a practical correction.
The homepage, product schema, and third-party profiles use different naming and category language.
Organization → Product relationship: incompletesameAs coverage: 2 of 6 key profilesStandardize the product entity and connect authoritative profiles through structured data and supporting page copy.
We compare the same evidence categories across your brand and one direct competitor—then isolate the gaps that are realistic to close.
Each recommendation is ranked by evidence, potential impact, implementation effort, and dependency—not by a generic checklist.
Resolve entity conflicts, positioning ambiguity, and technical access issues.
Improve structured data, documentation, source support, and answer-ready content.
Recheck the evidence, document changes, and establish a monitoring baseline.
We begin with a free, focused diagnosis. If we find a material opportunity, we show you the evidence and propose a tightly scoped pilot. You decide whether the findings justify the investment.
Send your site, industry, and one competitor.
We identify one or more meaningful discoverability gaps.
Only proceed if the scope and business case make sense.
Get the full analysis, competitor benchmark, and prioritized implementation.
Final scope depends on site size, evidence complexity, and implementation needs.
Full report, one-competitor benchmark, prioritized action plan, and implementation of the agreed highest-value fixes.
Request a Free DiagnosisOngoing evidence checks, competitive movement, change tracking, new risks, and prioritized monthly recommendations.
Ask about monitoringNo. Search fundamentals matter, but the report focuses on whether AI systems can resolve your entity, interpret your evidence, and confidently use your content when forming answers.
No. No provider can guarantee how independent AI systems rank, cite, recommend, or generate answers. We identify evidence gaps and improve readiness.
Your website, industry, one competitor, and a short description of your highest-value customer questions. No account access is required for the free diagnosis.
You receive a concise initial finding. If the opportunity is meaningful, we scope a paid pilot that delivers the full report and helps implement the highest-priority fixes.
Scores are evidence-based estimates derived from observable technical, entity, content, authority, and citation-readiness signals. They are not proprietary ranking data from any AI platform.
Complete a short form about your company, website, and one competitor. We will review your public evidence and respond with an initial finding and the clearest next step.
Your contact and company details will be recorded for review.
No account access or confidential information is required.
We will contact you at the email address you provide.
The form opens in a new tab. Your information will be used only to evaluate your request and contact you about your diagnosis.
QueryTrends evaluates publicly observable signals, including technical accessibility, entity consistency, structured data, content quality, source support, authority indicators, and comparative evidence. AI readiness scores are evidence-based estimates—not proprietary ranking, citation, or recommendation data from OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Perplexity, or any other AI provider.
AI system behavior is dynamic and outside our control. QueryTrends does not guarantee rankings, citations, mentions, traffic, leads, recommendations, or revenue. Findings reflect the evidence available at the time of analysis.